Websites are most effective if they are kept up-to-date. While this may seem almost too obvious to state, the harsh reality is that most sites aren’t updated nearly as often as they should be.
Unless a site should change very infrequently, it is crucial that managers and personnel be able to upgrade the website development and not having to go through a web developer or technical staffer.
Should your web designer advises building a static site, run the other way!
There was a time when building pages in Dreamweaver was obviously a reasonable way to develop an online site, but that time is past. All but the very simplest sites should be built in some type of CMS.
The CMS you select will have an enormous influence on the alleviate of editing the site. Some points to look for:
- Clean separation of content (typically text and images) from styling and layout. The styling and layout should be programmed once the site is built.
- The cabability to edit content “in-place”, while seeking at the website, rather than always having to find the related content in the control panel.
- The ability to support whatever content structure you need, and relate one type of content to another (such as authors and articles, or performers and events).
Content is living force of a website, in fact it is what the search engines feed on. The moment making a website, makes sure you take into consideration good structure for content (headings, paragraphs, and links).
Sites with very little content tend to struggle in the search results and, in most cases, this could be avoided if there is proper planning in the design stages. For occasion, don’t use images for text unless you use a CSS background image text replacement technique.
Various people write content in Word, and then substance it their website. This kind of is the supply of much grief.
Left to the own devices, content from Word will be pasted in as a huge, ugly block of HTML CODE that tries to style the HTML to totally match the Word file.
Alas, that is not what you want. Web site, sizes, line spacing, colors, and so forth should all be dependant on the site’s CSS stylesheet, not embedded in the CODE.
Using Word-generated HTML also bloats the markup (there’s hundreds of lines of useless code for an individual line of text) and makes it harder to edit.
Most publishers have some kind of “paste from Word” function, or at least “paste as plain text”. That’s what you should use if you must use content from Word. The goal is to strip away all the styling that you don’t want, while possibly preserving some strength elements (such as lists), and so the website’s styling can rule.
The most reliable approach is to insert as plain text, and then apply all the formatting (identifying headings, prospect lists, etc. ) using the editor’s tools. Or, even bettter, use a writer-oriented markup language, such as Textile or Markdown, and a system that automatically converts that markup into HTML.
Any way you cut it, authoring quality HTML CODE content can be complicated. The best approach, when you’re creating lots of web-focused content, is to use a different markup language–one that is designed to be automatically converted into HTML.
You could have encountered such markup in the context of a wiki or other online publishing system. The two most popular markup different languages are Markdown and Fabric.
The good thing about these markup languages for writers is that they are much much easier to write than CODE, and so they can be automatically translated to HTML with high reliability. The idea is to realise a minimal way to provide just enough structural information to stipulate the HTML which should be made.
Webmasters with limited mobile optimization knowledge feel that making website components smaller solves everything. Many of these a narrow view makes mobile usability and end user experience take the back again seat. Optimizing for mobile phones is not simply about making graphics smaller. The understanding of miniaturization and mobilization decides where your website or application rates on an individual experience.
Breaking down means building mobile systems by using latest technology (XHTML, HTML5 and CSS3) while adhering to mobile UX best practices. With the changing user behaviors and preferences, your website can’t you need to be mobile friendly; it needs to be ‘built for mobile’. Deciding on between a responsive website, adaptive website or mobile software is the first step towards mobilization.
Hopefully your website scores As across the board for the 10 areas we recognized. If it doesn’t, which solid chance you’re dropping out on opportunities from millennial age propsects, customers and guests. Stratus enjoys the energy and opportunities millennials bring to the ultra-modern business world and we can help you design a site that harnesses the they possess!
Comments are closed.